On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Dirk Pranke <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Dirk Pranke <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> > I remember some discussion of a [rebaseline] keyword in > >> > TestExpectations, > >> > but I'm not sure that ever made it in? > >> > >> The [ NeedsRebaseline ] enhancement is, as of yet, unimplemented and > >> unclaimed [2]. It shouldn't be too hard for someone to try it if > >> they're looking for a reason to explore the NRWT code :) > > > > > > I object to adding such a thing. People add and forget about these > entries > > way too often: > > > > The rationale for adding the keyword was precisely this ... it would > make it easier to programmatically identify tests needing updated > baselines and alert people :). > > Do you have an alternative you'd suggest for keeping people from > forgetting (particularly in the case where we have an expected failure > waiting on a bug fix)? > Just turn bots red. People maintaining bots will notice and rebaseline them as needed. - R. Niwa
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
