On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Ami Fischman <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Antti Koivisto <[email protected]> wrote: > >> When making cache related changes I have frequently found bugs from my >> patches because some seemingly random test started failing and I >> investigated. Without the test coverage some of those bugs would probably >> now be in the tree. >> > > That seems like an argument for writing more tests specifically for cache > code, not for holding the entire rest of the tests corpus hostage. > I agree this is a good change but it appears that we should add more cache/loader tests before changing DRT's behavior given that there are active contributors who rely on the current DRT behaviors to detect regressions. - Ryosuke
_______________________________________________ webkit-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo/webkit-dev
