On Jun 14, 2008, at 10:36 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> I would prefer if we keep a JS prefix only on the objects that seem
> like very generic names otherwise.
Makes sense.
Given that rule of thumb, what do you think of these:
"GetterSetterImp" => "JSGetterSetter",
"NumberImp" => "JSNumberCell",
"StringImp" => "JSString",
"ArrayInstance" => "JSArray",
"FunctionImp" => "JSFunction",
Do all of those deserve the JS prefix? Maybe the first three and not
the last two?
> Another thought that came up is that perhaps we should change our
> namespace from KJS to JSC.
I like the idea. But I'm not crazy about the three WebKit namespaces
being WTF, JSC, and WebCore. One of these things is not like the others!
-- Darin
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
