On Jun 13, 2008, at 3:51 PM, Geoffrey Garen wrote:
>> Cut down on confusing uses of "Object" and "Imp".
>
> Should we add the JS prefix to these, too?
I'm not sure.
If we want to add a JS prefix to all these names, then there'd be even
more names to change because I left some closely related names alone,
and they'd need the JS prefixes.
A while back, I added JS to "Value" and "Object" because even with a
namespace, the names "Value" and "Object" didn't seem clearly enough
to be "JavaScript language value". I think that applies to many of
these other types too. It's hard to say. Maybe we do indeed want JS
prefixes on all of these.
-- Darin
_______________________________________________
webkit-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.webkit.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/webkit-dev
