Hi, On 5 October 2017 at 13:39, Emil Velikov <[email protected]> wrote: > On 29 September 2017 at 14:00, Emil Velikov <[email protected]> wrote: >> With the above data in mind, we can reuse the current Wayland version >> AKA WAYLAND_VERSION. >> It should just work for all the known cases, plus it provides >> consistency as a nice bonus. >> > Daniel reminded me that my suggestion above is bonkers. Apparently I > missed the leading "1." in Wayland version 1.15. > I think we should be able to update the three components quite easily > and thus use the Wayland version. > > Alternatively I'm all ears. Anyone?
Honestly I think we should just use the Mesa version and document it as a historical aberration. Total version purity is nice, but I can't at all see how it's worth breaking peoples' compilation. If I was a downstream, I'd be pretty upset about that. Cheers, Daniel _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
