On Monday, 8 February 2016, Bill Spitzak <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 2:02 AM, Pekka Paalanen <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 21:03:20 +0100 >> Benoit Gschwind <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> > I will add my opinion as called for opinions. First I made a quick >> > brainstorm following previous proposals about solutions available. I see >> > 3 mains choice: >> >> Hi, >> >> thanks for looking into this. >> >> > 1. a structure that user fill and pass to the back end; >> > 2. an opaque structure that the user fill through helper function; >> > 3. a free list of key/value pair. >> > > The Wayland message api only allows sending of a small set of primitive > data types. So if you have a "structure" that is more complex than one of > those data types, the only way to send it is through multiple arguments to > (possibly multiple) Wayland requests. Therefore it seems like it is limited > to solutions 2 and 3, right? >
... you do know that libweston is a C library and not a Wayland protocol, right? These are the sorts of things that make it difficult (trending towards impossible) to take your review seriously.
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
