On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 04:19:03PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > There is no need here to use µs since we're just handling speeds/thresholds, > not actual events where a ms granularity can be too high. > > Moving back to ms lets us drop a bunch of zeroes that clutter up the code, and > since the acceleration functions are a bit magic anyway, having the various > 1000.0 factors in there makes it even less obvious. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <[email protected]> > --- > src/filter.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++------------------- > tools/ptraccel-debug.c | 4 ++-- > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/filter.c b/src/filter.c > index 54ae397..f5a3748 100644 > --- a/src/filter.c > +++ b/src/filter.c > @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ filter_get_speed(struct motion_filter *filter) > * Default parameters for pointer acceleration profiles. > */ > > -#define DEFAULT_THRESHOLD 0.0004 /* in units/us */ > +#define DEFAULT_THRESHOLD 0.4 /* in units/ms */ > #define DEFAULT_ACCELERATION 2.0 /* unitless factor */ > #define DEFAULT_INCLINE 1.1 /* unitless factor */ > > @@ -220,7 +220,7 @@ calculate_velocity(struct pointer_accelerator *accel, > uint64_t time) > } > } > > - return result; /* units/us */ > + return result * 1000; /* units/ms */
Did you consider changing velocity back to units/ms everywhere, i.e. calculate_tracker_velocity? Doing it here would mean "velocity" means different depending on where in the code it is. Also, I wonder how I could have missed 2/3. Sorry about that. With the above comment in mind, these three are still Reviewed-by: Jonas Ådahl <[email protected]> > } > > static double > @@ -256,11 +256,11 @@ calculate_acceleration(struct pointer_accelerator > *accel, > static struct normalized_coords > accelerator_filter(struct motion_filter *filter, > const struct normalized_coords *unaccelerated, > - void *data, uint64_t time) > + void *data, uint64_t time /* in us */) > { > struct pointer_accelerator *accel = > (struct pointer_accelerator *) filter; > - double velocity; /* units/us */ > + double velocity; /* units/ms */ > double accel_value; /* unitless factor */ > struct normalized_coords accelerated; > struct normalized_coords unnormalized; > @@ -397,23 +397,23 @@ create_pointer_accelerator_filter(accel_profile_func_t > profile, > double > pointer_accel_profile_linear_low_dpi(struct motion_filter *filter, > void *data, > - double speed_in, /* in device units > (units/us) */ > - uint64_t time) > + double speed_in, /* in device units > (units/ms) */ > + uint64_t time /* in us */) > { > struct pointer_accelerator *accel_filter = > (struct pointer_accelerator *)filter; > > double s1, s2; > double max_accel = accel_filter->accel; /* unitless factor */ > - const double threshold = accel_filter->threshold; /* units/us */ > + const double threshold = accel_filter->threshold; /* units/ms */ > const double incline = accel_filter->incline; > double factor; > double dpi_factor = accel_filter->dpi_factor; > > max_accel /= dpi_factor; > > - s1 = min(1, 0.3 + speed_in * 10000.0); > - s2 = 1 + (speed_in * 1000.0 - threshold * dpi_factor * 1000.0) * > incline; > + s1 = min(1, 0.3 + speed_in * 10.0); > + s2 = 1 + (speed_in - threshold * dpi_factor) * incline; > > factor = min(max_accel, s2 > 1 ? s2 : s1); > > @@ -424,19 +424,19 @@ double > pointer_accel_profile_linear(struct motion_filter *filter, > void *data, > double speed_in, /* 1000-dpi normalized */ > - uint64_t time) > + uint64_t time /* in us */) > { > struct pointer_accelerator *accel_filter = > (struct pointer_accelerator *)filter; > > double s1, s2; > const double max_accel = accel_filter->accel; /* unitless factor */ > - const double threshold = accel_filter->threshold; /* units/us */ > + const double threshold = accel_filter->threshold; /* units/ms */ > const double incline = accel_filter->incline; > double factor; > > - s1 = min(1, 0.3 + speed_in * 10 * 1000.0); > - s2 = 1 + (speed_in * 1000.0 - threshold * 1000.0) * incline; > + s1 = min(1, 0.3 + speed_in * 10); > + s2 = 1 + (speed_in - threshold) * incline; > > factor = min(max_accel, s2 > 1 ? s2 : s1); > > @@ -446,8 +446,8 @@ pointer_accel_profile_linear(struct motion_filter *filter, > double > touchpad_accel_profile_linear(struct motion_filter *filter, > void *data, > - double speed_in, > - uint64_t time) > + double speed_in, > + uint64_t time /* in us */) > { > /* Once normalized, touchpads see the same > acceleration as mice. that is technically correct but > @@ -468,7 +468,7 @@ double > touchpad_lenovo_x230_accel_profile(struct motion_filter *filter, > void *data, > double speed_in, > - uint64_t time) > + uint64_t time /* in us */) > { > /* Keep the magic factor from touchpad_accel_profile_linear. */ > const double TP_MAGIC_SLOWDOWN = 0.4; > @@ -488,13 +488,13 @@ touchpad_lenovo_x230_accel_profile(struct motion_filter > *filter, > const double max_accel = accel_filter->accel * > TP_MAGIC_LOW_RES_FACTOR; /* unitless factor */ > const double threshold = accel_filter->threshold / > - TP_MAGIC_LOW_RES_FACTOR; /* units/us */ > + TP_MAGIC_LOW_RES_FACTOR; /* units/ms */ > const double incline = accel_filter->incline * TP_MAGIC_LOW_RES_FACTOR; > > speed_in *= TP_MAGIC_SLOWDOWN / TP_MAGIC_LOW_RES_FACTOR; > > - s1 = min(1, speed_in * 5 * 1000.0); > - s2 = 1 + (speed_in * 1000.0 - threshold * 1000.0) * incline; > + s1 = min(1, speed_in * 5); > + s2 = 1 + (speed_in - threshold) * incline; > > speed_out = min(max_accel, s2 > 1 ? s2 : s1); > > diff --git a/tools/ptraccel-debug.c b/tools/ptraccel-debug.c > index b0867db..1496763 100644 > --- a/tools/ptraccel-debug.c > +++ b/tools/ptraccel-debug.c > @@ -147,12 +147,12 @@ print_accel_func(struct motion_filter *filter) > printf("# set ylabel \"raw accel factor\"\n"); > printf("# set style data lines\n"); > printf("# plot \"gnuplot.data\" using 1:2\n"); > - for (vel = 0.0; vel < 0.003; vel += 0.0000001) { > + for (vel = 0.0; vel < 3.0; vel += .0001) { > double result = pointer_accel_profile_linear(filter, > NULL, > vel, > 0 /* time */); > - printf("%.8f\t%.4f\n", vel, result); > + printf("%.4f\t%.4f\n", vel, result); > } > } > > -- > 2.4.3 > > _______________________________________________ > wayland-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
