On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 11:00:21 -0600 "Jasper St. Pierre" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:54 AM, Pekka Paalanen <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I don't think we ever want the compositor drawing the cursor in > > pointer-locked mode... do we? Would there be any use cases benefitting > > from it? > > > > There's an additional problem here: where should the cursor be drawn? Will > wl_relative_pointer have a set_cursor_position argument while in relative > mode? I assumed there would be. It certainly was discussed in the past. > I could see arguments in favor of it (ability to reuse the cursor plane), There is nothing special with set_cursor wl_surfaces compared to any other wl_surfaces in the protocol. Re-using a cursor plane is not a point at all. A compositor will put any wl_surfaces on the cursor plane whenever it can, and we do not communicate or set any cursor-specific constraints to clients. > but we can leave this out for now. If we want to add it back, we say that > the cursor is always drawn in the center of the surface, unchanging, and if > apps want to remove it, they blank it. Thanks, pq _______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
