Hi,
On 8 November 2012 08:13, Tiago Vignatti <[email protected]>wrote: > On 11/07/2012 06:35 PM, Daniel Stone wrote: >> >> Well, I think we could take all the server patches (including >> init_complete), and drop the Expose and resize patches from Weston if >> you like. >> > > actually I don't see any problems on pushing the expose and resize stuff > on 1.0 as well. But I was trying to say that it will be disregarded once we > start to look on xwm client approach because it touches the core of that > work. Same for the WM initialization we were discussing... > Hm, the expose stuff we can certainly push, but I think the resize bits might impact things a bit, since it changes X server <-> window manager <-> compositing manager semantics, so there might be a problem if we decide to change that later. I'll take a look and see today tho. > So I'd suggest to "compile-fix" XWayland for 1.0 quickly and then we all > jump our work to my branch; note that there will be a huge rebase to make > my branch work again due it's a month old now. > Indeed. But let's see how it goes. :) Cheers, Daniel
_______________________________________________ wayland-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/wayland-devel
