Hi Rose,

I don't see any single quotes around the query in the explain function call ?

Best Regards
Hugh Williams
Professional Services
OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
Weblog   -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
Twitter  -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
Google+  -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers

On 26 Nov 2013, at 05:11, Rose Beck <rosebeck...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I tried to use explain() with SPARQL but its giving me the following error. 
> Also does explain return the query execution time(which does not include the 
> compilation time).
> 
> SQL> explain (sparql select * where{?a ?b ?c});
> 
> *** Error 37000: [Virtuoso Driver][Virtuoso Server]SQ074: Line 1: syntax 
> error at 'sparql' before 'SELECT'
> at line 3 of Top-Level:
> explain (sparql select * where{?a ?b ?c})
> SQL> sparql explain(select * where{?a ?b ?c});
> 
> *** Error 37000: [Virtuoso Driver][Virtuoso Server]SQ074: Line 1: SP030: 
> SPARQL compiler, line 1: syntax error at 'explain' before '('
> at line 4 of Top-Level:
> sparql explain(select * where{?a ?b ?c})
> SQL> explain (select * where{?a ?b ?c});
> 
> *** Error 37000: [Virtuoso Driver][Virtuoso Server]SQ074: Line 1: syntax 
> error at 'select' before '*'
> at line 5 of Top-Level:
> explain (select * where{?a ?b ?c})
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Hugh Williams <hwilli...@openlinksw.com> 
> wrote:
> Hi Rose,
> 
> You can use the explain() function to obtain a query plan with v6 but it will 
> not include the compilation time, see:
>       
>       
> http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/databaseadmsrv.html#perfdiagqueryplans
> 
> Best Regards
> Hugh Williams
> Professional Services
> OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
> Weblog   -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
> LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
> Twitter  -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
> Google+  -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
> Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
> Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers
> 
> On 26 Nov 2013, at 01:55, Rose Beck <rosebeck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Actually I do  not have admin privileges on the server which I am using, so 
>> wont be able to upgrade to version 7. Therefore it will be really great if 
>> there is a method by which I may do profiling  with virtuoso version 6.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Rose Beck <rosebeck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thanks a lot for helping again.
>> 
>> Is there some way out by which I may do profiling with V6?
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Hugh Williams <hwilli...@openlinksw.com> 
>> wrote:
>> Hi Rose,
>> 
>> As you are runing v6 the profile function will not work it requires v7+ ...
>> 
>> The following shows simpler output with the compilation time being stated at 
>> the end:
>> 
>> SQL> profile ('sparql select count(*) where {?s ?p ?o}');
>> result
>> LONG VARCHAR
>> _______________________________________________________________________________
>> 
>> 287536       
>> 
>> { 
>> time      0.11% fanout         1 input         1 rows
>> time      0.08% fanout         1 input         1 rows
>> { fork
>> time     1e+02% fanout         0 input         1 rows
>> RDF_QUAD   2.9e+05 rows()
>>  
>>  
>> After code:
>>       0:  sum callret-0 1 set no set_ctr
>>       5: BReturn 0
>> }
>> time     0.046% fanout         0 input         1 rows
>> Select (callret-0)
>> }
>> 
>> 
>>  4 msec 77% cpu,         1 rnd    287210 seq         0% same seg         0% 
>> same pg 
>> Compilation: 1 msec 0 reads         0% read 0 messages         0% clw
>> 
>> 4 Rows. -- 132 msec.
>> SQL>
>> 
>> So compilation is 1ms and execution is 132msec
>> 
>> Best Regards
>> Hugh Williams
>> Professional Services
>> OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
>> Weblog   -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
>> LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
>> Twitter  -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
>> Google+  -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
>> Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
>> Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers
>> 
>> On 25 Nov 2013, at 11:19, Rose Beck <rosebeck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Dear Hugh,
>>> 
>>> Thanks a lot for the help.
>>> I am using virtuoso version: Version 6.1.8-dev.3127-pthreads as of Aug 10 
>>> 2013
>>> Also I am unable to find the compilation and query execution time from the 
>>> example result set given below. Can you please help me a bit with this.
>>> {
>>> -- In the below excerpt some lines are omitted. Comments are inline.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> time   1.3e-06% fanout         1          1 rows in
>>> 
>>> s# 98 cluster outer seq start, set no <V $40 set_ctr in>   
>>> save ctx:()
>>> 
>>> -- the section inside the fork is executed to the end 
>>> -- before the section after the fork is started.
>>> s# 161 Fork 42
>>> { 
>>> wait time   0.00012% of exec real time, fanout         0
>>> 
>>> -- The below introduces the 2 stage DFG which does most of the work.
>>> s# 108   { Cluster location fragment 51 0 unordered
>>>    Params: ()
>>> Output: ()   
>>> 
>>> -- First partitioning step. Each of the 32 slices gets the 
>>> -- identical plan to execute, this is a flood for all is this 
>>> -- first step does not specify a partitioning key value.
>>> 
>>> time     8e-05% fanout         0          0 rows in
>>> s# 115 Stage 1: Params: (<V $112 set_ctr in>)
>>> 
>>> -- This is the initial table scan. The operator is executed 
>>> -- 32 times, once for each slice of data. 
>>> 
>>> time      0.33% fanout   3.1e+06         32 rows in
>>> s# 121 from DB.DBA.ct_c by ct_c    1.7e+08 rows  
>>> Key ct_c  ASC  (<V $28 a.k2 in>)
>>>  [copies params]
>>> vector param casts: <V $40 set_ctr in>-> <V $112 set_ctr in>
>>>  
>>> -- This is the second partitioning step, each of the rows of 
>>> -- output of the previous is sent to the slice corresponding to K2.
>>> 
>>> time        31% fanout       0.9      2e+08 rows in
>>> s# 131 Stage 2: Params: (<v $134 q_a.k2 S136 in>, <V $138 set_ctr in>)
>>> 
>>> -- This is the 2nd index lookup, by a.k2 = b.k1 There are two 
>>> -- parameters given in the vector param cast section, the first 
>>> -- is a.k2 and the second is the set number. This is constant 
>>> -- since the query is run on a single row of input but if the 
>>> -- query were run on multiple rows of input this would specify 
>>> -- which row of input the a.k2 comes from so that this would be 
>>> -- aggregated in the right place. Many aggregates can be produced 
>>> -- in a single invocation with multiple rows of input.
>>> 
>>> time        68% fanout         0      2e+08 rows in
>>> s# 144 from DB.DBA.ct_c by ct_c  unq         1 rows   
>>> Key ct_c  ASC  ()
>>>  inlined  k1 = <v $134 q_a.k2 S136 in>
>>> vector param casts: <V $28 a.k2 in>-> <v $134 q_a.k2 S136 in>, <r $112 
>>> set_ctr via  S121>-> <V $138 set_ctr in>
>>>  
>>>  
>>> -- This is the aggregation.
>>> 
>>> After code:
>>>       0:  sum <V $43 count i> 1 set no <r $138 set_ctr via  S144>
>>>       5: BReturn 0
>>>  
>>> }
>>> }
>>> 
>>> -- The below returns the aggregate to the client. The combining of 
>>> -- aggregates from different slices is implicit in the for operator 
>>> -- whenever this ends with a cluster location fragment.
>>> 
>>> time   5.4e-07% fanout         0          1 rows in
>>> s# 164 Select (<V $43 count i>)
>>>   set no: <V $40 set_ctr in>
>>> }
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Rose Beck <rosebeck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Dear Hugh,
>>> 
>>> Thanks a lot for the help. I tried to profile using profile but I am 
>>> getting the following errors:
>>> SQL> profile('sparql select ?a?b?c where{?a ?b ?c}');
>>> 
>>> *** Error 42001: [Virtuoso Driver][Virtuoso Server]SR185: Undefined 
>>> procedure DB.DBA.profile.
>>> at line 9 of Top-Level:
>>> profile('sparql select ?a?b?c where{?a ?b ?c}')
>>> SQL> sparql profile('select ?a?b?c where{?a ?b ?c}');
>>> 
>>> *** Error 37000: [Virtuoso Driver][Virtuoso Server]SQ074: Line 1: SP030: 
>>> SPARQL compiler, line 1: syntax error at 'profile' before '('
>>> at line 10 of Top-Level:
>>> sparql profile('select ?a?b?c where{?a ?b ?c}')
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Hugh Williams <hwilli...@openlinksw.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> Hi Rose,
>>> 
>>> With Virtuoso 7 you can obtain the compilation (query plan) and query 
>>> execution time of a query using the "profile" function as detailed at:
>>> 
>>>     
>>> http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/databaseadmsrv.html#readingqueryprofile
>>> 
>>> You can also enable general query logging and profiling using the 
>>> "prof_enable" function as detailed at:
>>> 
>>>     http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/databaseadmsrv.html#querylogging
>>> 
>>>     
>>> Best Regards
>>> Hugh Williams
>>> Professional Services
>>> OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
>>> Weblog   -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
>>> LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
>>> Twitter  -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
>>> Google+  -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
>>> Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
>>> Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers
>>> 
>>> On 25 Nov 2013, at 09:15, Rose Beck <rosebeck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> After executing SPARQL queries in virtuoso using:
>>>> 1. ./isql 1111 dba dba
>>>> 2. And then firing the SPARQL query
>>>> 
>>>> After this virtuoso returns the query execution time. So does the returned 
>>>> time include the plan generation time. If yes, is it possible to find:
>>>>  (plan generation time) and (time to retrieve the results after the plan 
>>>> has already been generated by Virtuoso)?
>>>> 
>>>> I need to know these query times as I am benchmarking Virtuoso against 
>>>> postgreSQL. With postgresql I am able to separately retrieve the query 
>>>> execution time after the plan has been generated by postgresql using 
>>>> \timing. It would be great if Virtuoso could  also give me the time it 
>>>> takes to retrieve the results after the plan has been generated separately 
>>>>  as that would help me take a one to one comparison.
>>>> 
>>>> I'll be really grateful to you for the guidance. 
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
>>>> Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
>>>> Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing 
>>>> conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up 
>>>> now. 
>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________
>>>> Virtuoso-users mailing list
>>>> Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
>> Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
>> Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing 
>> conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. 
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________
>> Virtuoso-users mailing list
>> Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing 
conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Virtuoso-users mailing list
Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users

Reply via email to