Actually I do not have admin privileges on the server which I am using, so
wont be able to upgrade to version 7. Therefore it will be really great if
there is a method by which I may do profiling with virtuoso version 6.
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Rose Beck <rosebeck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot for helping again.
>
> Is there some way out by which I may do profiling with V6?
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Hugh Williams
> <hwilli...@openlinksw.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Rose,
>>
>> As you are runing v6 the profile function will not work it requires v7+
>> ...
>>
>> The following shows simpler output with the compilation time being stated
>> at the end:
>>
>> SQL> profile ('sparql select count(*) where {?s ?p ?o}');
>> result
>> LONG VARCHAR
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________________
>>
>> 287536
>>
>> {
>> time 0.11% fanout 1 input 1 rows
>> time 0.08% fanout 1 input 1 rows
>> { fork
>> time 1e+02% fanout 0 input 1 rows
>> RDF_QUAD 2.9e+05 rows()
>>
>>
>> After code:
>> 0: sum callret-0 1 set no set_ctr
>> 5: BReturn 0
>> }
>> time 0.046% fanout 0 input 1 rows
>> Select (callret-0)
>> }
>>
>>
>> 4 msec 77% cpu, 1 rnd 287210 seq 0% same seg
>> 0% same pg
>> Compilation: 1 msec 0 reads 0% read 0 messages 0% clw
>>
>> 4 Rows. -- 132 msec.
>> SQL>
>>
>> So compilation is 1ms and execution is 132msec
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Hugh Williams
>> Professional Services
>> OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/
>> Weblog -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
>> LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
>> Twitter -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
>> Google+ -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
>> Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
>> Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers
>>
>> On 25 Nov 2013, at 11:19, Rose Beck <rosebeck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Hugh,
>>
>> Thanks a lot for the help.
>> I am using virtuoso version: Version 6.1.8-dev.3127-pthreads as of Aug 10
>> 2013
>> Also I am unable to find the compilation and query execution time from
>> the example result set given below. Can you please help me a bit with this.
>>
>> {
>> -- In the below excerpt some lines are omitted. Comments are inline.
>>
>>
>> time 1.3e-06% fanout 1 1 rows in
>>
>> s# 98 cluster outer seq start, set no <V $40 set_ctr in>
>> save ctx:()
>>
>> -- the section inside the fork is executed to the end
>> -- before the section after the fork is started.
>> s# 161 Fork 42
>> {
>> wait time 0.00012% of exec real time, fanout 0
>>
>> -- The below introduces the 2 stage DFG which does most of the work.
>> s# 108 { Cluster location fragment 51 0 unordered
>> Params: ()
>> Output: ()
>>
>> -- First partitioning step. Each of the 32 slices gets the
>> -- identical plan to execute, this is a flood for all is this
>> -- first step does not specify a partitioning key value.
>>
>> time 8e-05% fanout 0 0 rows in
>> s# 115 Stage 1: Params: (<V $112 set_ctr in>)
>>
>> -- This is the initial table scan. The operator is executed
>> -- 32 times, once for each slice of data.
>>
>> time 0.33% fanout 3.1e+06 32 rows in
>> s# 121 from DB.DBA.ct_c by ct_c 1.7e+08 rows
>> Key ct_c ASC (<V $28 a.k2 in>)
>> [copies params]
>> vector param casts: <V $40 set_ctr in>-> <V $112 set_ctr in>
>>
>> -- This is the second partitioning step, each of the rows of
>> -- output of the previous is sent to the slice corresponding to K2.
>>
>> time 31% fanout 0.9 2e+08 rows in
>> s# 131 Stage 2: Params: (<v $134 q_a.k2 S136 in>, <V $138 set_ctr in>)
>>
>> -- This is the 2nd index lookup, by a.k2 = b.k1 There are two
>> -- parameters given in the vector param cast section, the first
>> -- is a.k2 and the second is the set number. This is constant
>> -- since the query is run on a single row of input but if the
>> -- query were run on multiple rows of input this would specify
>> -- which row of input the a.k2 comes from so that this would be
>> -- aggregated in the right place. Many aggregates can be produced
>> -- in a single invocation with multiple rows of input.
>>
>> time 68% fanout 0 2e+08 rows in
>> s# 144 from DB.DBA.ct_c by ct_c unq 1 rows
>> Key ct_c ASC ()
>> inlined k1 = <v $134 q_a.k2 S136 in>
>> vector param casts: <V $28 a.k2 in>-> <v $134 q_a.k2 S136 in>, <r $112
>> set_ctr via S121>-> <V $138 set_ctr in>
>>
>>
>> -- This is the aggregation.
>>
>> After code:
>> 0: sum <V $43 count i> 1 set no <r $138 set_ctr via S144>
>> 5: BReturn 0
>>
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -- The below returns the aggregate to the client. The combining of
>> -- aggregates from different slices is implicit in the for operator
>> -- whenever this ends with a cluster location fragment.
>>
>> time 5.4e-07% fanout 0 1 rows in
>> s# 164 Select (<V $43 count i>)
>> set no: <V $40 set_ctr in>
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Rose Beck <rosebeck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Hugh,
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot for the help. I tried to profile using profile but I am
>>> getting the following errors:
>>> SQL> profile('sparql select ?a?b?c where{?a ?b ?c}');
>>>
>>> *** Error 42001: [Virtuoso Driver][Virtuoso Server]SR185: Undefined
>>> procedure DB.DBA.profile.
>>> at line 9 of Top-Level:
>>> profile('sparql select ?a?b?c where{?a ?b ?c}')
>>> SQL> sparql profile('select ?a?b?c where{?a ?b ?c}');
>>>
>>> *** Error 37000: [Virtuoso Driver][Virtuoso Server]SQ074: Line 1: SP030:
>>> SPARQL compiler, line 1: syntax error at 'profile' before '('
>>> at line 10 of Top-Level:
>>> sparql profile('select ?a?b?c where{?a ?b ?c}')
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Hugh Williams <hwilli...@openlinksw.com
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Rose,
>>>>
>>>> With Virtuoso 7 you can obtain the compilation (query plan) and query
>>>> execution time of a query using the "profile" function as detailed at:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/databaseadmsrv.html#readingqueryprofile
>>>>
>>>> You can also enable general query logging and profiling using the
>>>> "prof_enable" function as detailed at:
>>>>
>>>> http://docs.openlinksw.com/virtuoso/databaseadmsrv.html#querylogging
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> Hugh Williams
>>>> Professional Services
>>>> OpenLink Software, Inc. // http://www.openlinksw.com/
>>>> Weblog -- http://www.openlinksw.com/blogs/
>>>> LinkedIn -- http://www.linkedin.com/company/openlink-software/
>>>> Twitter -- http://twitter.com/OpenLink
>>>> Google+ -- http://plus.google.com/100570109519069333827/
>>>> Facebook -- http://www.facebook.com/OpenLinkSoftware
>>>> Universal Data Access, Integration, and Management Technology Providers
>>>>
>>>> On 25 Nov 2013, at 09:15, Rose Beck <rosebeck...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> After executing SPARQL queries in virtuoso using:
>>>> 1. ./isql 1111 dba dba
>>>> 2. And then firing the SPARQL query
>>>>
>>>> After this virtuoso returns the query execution time. So does the
>>>> returned time include the plan generation time. If yes, is it possible to
>>>> find:
>>>> (plan generation time) and (time to retrieve the results after the
>>>> plan has already been generated by Virtuoso)?
>>>>
>>>> I need to know these query times as I am benchmarking Virtuoso against
>>>> postgreSQL. With postgresql I am able to separately retrieve the query
>>>> execution time after the plan has been generated by postgresql using
>>>> \timing. It would be great if Virtuoso could also give me the time it
>>>> takes to retrieve the results after the plan has been generated separately
>>>> as that would help me take a one to one comparison.
>>>>
>>>> I'll be really grateful to you for the guidance.
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
>>>> Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
>>>> Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and
>>>> game-changing
>>>> conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up
>>>> now.
>>>>
>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk_______________________________________________
>>>> Virtuoso-users mailing list
>>>> Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing
conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Virtuoso-users mailing list
Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users
