whoops :-)

here's the proper commands

[root@cognac ~]# hostname
cognac.elec.qmul.ac.uk
[root@cognac ~]# dig +short 'hostname'
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
[root@cognac ~]# dig +short -x $(dig +short `hostname`)
[root@cognac ~]#

so actually that really doesn't look good.  is there something to
change in host.conf?

> This is very strange, can remote access be provided to the new empty database 
> you created so we can see this problem first hand > ? HTTP and/or SQL port 
> access would suffice ...

i'll see what i can do - there's a lot of university bureaucracy to
deal w/ tho...  is a copy of the virtuoso.db file sufficient?  i could
put this on another public server...

thanks!

-kurt j

On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:56 PM, Ted Thibodeau Jr
<tthibod...@openlinksw.com> wrote:
> Hi, Kurt --
>
>
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 09:42 AM, Kurt J wrote:
>
>> sorry took me a while to try this - been busy at websci :-)
>>
>>> As an aside, check your networking setup by doing a double-lookup on
>>> hostname:
>>
>> # dig +short cognac.elec.qmul.ac.uk
>> 138.37.xx.xx
>> # dig +short -x $(dig +short cognac.elec.qmul.ac.uk)
>>
>> first command gives the ip address.  second command returns nothing.
>> is this right? what should be in host.conf?  sorry i'm a server admin
>> noob :-)
>
>
> I don't believe the second return is correct.
>
> hostname is a command -- when wrapped in the ` characters, it executes, and
> its return gets substituted into the full command you're running.
>
> Please copy and paste these three commands into your terminal session, so
> they run on the Virtuoso host, exactly as shown --
>
>   hostname
>   dig +short `hostname`
>   dig +short -x $(dig +short `hostname`)
>
> For comparison, in my local environment, I get back --
>
>   macted$ hostname
>   dyn248.usnet.private
>   macted$ dig +short `hostname`
>   192.168.11.248
>   macted$ dig +short -x $(dig +short `hostname`)
>   dyn248.usnet.private.
>   macted$
>
>
> ...
>>
>
>
> On Mar 20, 2009, at 09:56 AM, Kurt J wrote:
>
>>> [Hugh] In your virtuoso.ini configuration file what is the value of the
>>> "DefaultHost" param in the "[URIQA]" section as I do believe the
>>> localhost:8890
>>
>> [URIQA]
>> DynamicLocal                    = 1
>> DefaultHost                     = localhost:8890
>>
>> tried changin this to hostname:80 and got the same old error.
>
>
> localhost:8890 is only valid if the Web browser you're running can load
> that URL -- including by local port forwarding -- which must be served up
> by the Virtuoso instance.  This address generally only works when running
> all Web clients directly on the Virtuoso host.
>
> hostname:80 is only valid if that has been set up with port-forwarding
> and/or vhost or similar settings, such that it reaches hostname:8890
> (presuming 8890 is the Virtuoso instance's HTTP port).
>
> Generally speaking, this should be set to the fully-qualified domain name
> (and Virtuoso HTTP port) of the Virtuoso host server -- but that presumes
> that the host and port are generally addressable, not behind a firewall.
>
> You'll need to set this to whatever <FQDN>:<port> can be used by both the
> Virtuoso instance itself *and* your end client to reach the Virtuoso
> listener on that port.
>
> Hope that helps,
>
> Ted
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> A: Yes.                      http://www.guckes.net/faq/attribution.html
> | Q: Are you sure?
> | | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
> | | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?
>
> Ted Thibodeau, Jr.           //               voice +1-781-273-0900 x32
> Evangelism & Support         //        mailto:tthibod...@openlinksw.com
> OpenLink Software, Inc.      //              http://www.openlinksw.com/
>                                 http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/uda/
> OpenLink Blogs              http://www.openlinksw.com/weblogs/virtuoso/
>                               http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen/
>    Universal Data Access and Virtual Database Technology Providers
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to