On 6/23/21 4:32 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 08:40:00AM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote: >> From: Brijesh Singh <[email protected]> >> >> Add the necessary defines for supporting the GHCB version 2 protocol. >> This includes defines for: >> >> - MSR-based AP hlt request/response >> - Hypervisor Feature request/response >> >> This is the bare minimum of requests that need to be supported by a GHCB >> version 2 implementation. There are more requests in the specification, >> but those depend on Secure Nested Paging support being available. >> >> These defines are shared between SEV host and guest support, so they are >> submitted as an individual patch without users yet to avoid merge >> conflicts in the future. >> >> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]> >> Co-developed-by: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]> >> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]> >> --- >> arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h | 15 +++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h >> b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h >> index 1cc9e7dd8107..9aa2f29b4c97 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/sev-common.h >> @@ -47,6 +47,21 @@ >> (((unsigned long)reg & GHCB_MSR_CPUID_REG_MASK) << >> GHCB_MSR_CPUID_REG_POS) | \ >> (((unsigned long)fn) << GHCB_MSR_CPUID_FUNC_POS)) >> >> +/* AP Reset Hold */ >> +#define GHCB_MSR_AP_RESET_HOLD_REQ 0x006 >> +#define GHCB_MSR_AP_RESET_HOLD_RESP 0x007 >> +#define GHCB_MSR_AP_RESET_HOLD_RESULT_POS 12 >> +#define GHCB_MSR_AP_RESET_HOLD_RESULT_MASK GENMASK_ULL(51, 0) >> + >> +/* GHCB Hypervisor Feature Request/Response */ >> +#define GHCB_MSR_HV_FT_REQ 0x080 >> +#define GHCB_MSR_HV_FT_RESP 0x081 >> +#define GHCB_MSR_HV_FT_POS 12 >> +#define GHCB_MSR_HV_FT_MASK GENMASK_ULL(51, 0) >> + >> +#define GHCB_MSR_HV_FT_RESP_VAL(v) \ >> + ((unsigned long)((v) >> GHCB_MSR_HV_FT_POS) & GHCB_MSR_HV_FT_MASK) >> + > Ok, so I took a critical look at this and it doesn't make sense to have > a differently named define each time you need the [63:12] slice of > GHCBData. So you can simply use GHCB_DATA(msr_value) instead, see below. > > Complaints?
Looks good to me. _______________________________________________ Virtualization mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
