> Yeah, that sounds right.  It looks like .16 may do what I need :)  I will
> await that and try.
>
> Thank you!
>
> -Jason

You can already try with the current HEAD in github:

https://github.com/unbit/uwsgi-docs/blob/master/LogEncoders.rst

the msgpack plugin is not built-in by default so to install it you have to
compile manually or embed in the core with something like:

UWSGI_EMBED_PLUGINS=msgpack make

let me know

P.S.

take in account logstash expects a map as the main structure, what you put
in this map is not a problem (i have pushed really complex structures with
dozens of nested array and so on)


>
> On 9/6/13 12:28 PM, "Roberto De Ioris" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>>> Howdy,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hmm, so it sounds like the only real way is to have uWSGI do it; or
>>> beat
>>> on the log once on the hard drive.  Having a logstash format on uWSGI
>>> would be awesome. :)
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> -Jason
>>
>>
>>AFAIK there is no "logstash" format. It expects some kind of key-value
>>object, so the upcoming log-encoder should be more than enough.
>>
>>As the only encoder i plan to release in 1.9.16 is the msgpack and
>>logstash supports it i suppose you only need to choose the transport
>> (udp,
>>tcp, zeromq, rsyslog...)
>>
>>am i right ?
>>
>>
>>--
>>Roberto De Ioris
>>http://unbit.it
>>_______________________________________________
>>uWSGI mailing list
>>[email protected]
>>http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
>
> _______________________________________________
> uWSGI mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
>


-- 
Roberto De Ioris
http://unbit.it
_______________________________________________
uWSGI mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi

Reply via email to