Yeah, that sounds right. It looks like .16 may do what I need :) I will await that and try.
Thank you! -Jason On 9/6/13 12:28 PM, "Roberto De Ioris" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Howdy, >> >> >> >> Hmm, so it sounds like the only real way is to have uWSGI do it; or beat >> on the log once on the hard drive. Having a logstash format on uWSGI >> would be awesome. :) >> >> Thanks! >> -Jason > > >AFAIK there is no "logstash" format. It expects some kind of key-value >object, so the upcoming log-encoder should be more than enough. > >As the only encoder i plan to release in 1.9.16 is the msgpack and >logstash supports it i suppose you only need to choose the transport (udp, >tcp, zeromq, rsyslog...) > >am i right ? > > >-- >Roberto De Ioris >http://unbit.it >_______________________________________________ >uWSGI mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi _______________________________________________ uWSGI mailing list [email protected] http://lists.unbit.it/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uwsgi
