On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:08:10AM +0100, Thorsten Schöning wrote: > If you come to the conclusion that you don't do this kind of hacking > anymore or even at all including this issue, users of the SVN-bridge > would simply need to change their workflow to something else. I'm > only using the bridge because it was the easiest way to stay with my > former workflow and how I manage some versioned libs. > > Or do you think it's not worth discussing that fundamentally (yet)?
Perhaps Github's customers will just need to press a little bit harder for a fix to be applied at Github's end? As Branko explained earlier, the fix amounts to sending another HTTP header in the response. Github's web developers should be able to manage that...
