On 09.12.2018 23:41, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sun, Dec 9, 2018 at 1:27 PM Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote: >> On 09.12.2018 19:14, Thorsten Schöning wrote: >>> Guten Tag Thorsten Schöning, >>> am Mittwoch, 21. November 2018 um 15:23 schrieben Sie: >>> >>>>> Thanks for following up. Our engineers have been able to reproduce >>>>> the error on our CI system and are working on a fix. >>> Another two weeks have passed without any hint to the status of this >>> problem from GH and I don't have the feeling that they are really >>> working on this. >>> >>> Does anyone have any other infos? If not, does the SVN-team has any >>> plans to release their workaround mentioned in the following ticket? >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SVN-4789 >> So, as I said in one of the mails referred to in that issue ... I'd >> really prefer not to do that. Yet on the other hand, that GitHub->SVN >> bridge is useful to users who're not locked into the gitficionado world. >> >> My current thinking is that if GitHub can't fix their protocol emulation >> by the time of the planned Subversion 1.12 release, we'll have to >> seriously consider including this patch. >> >> But I'd still rather not ... > I've reviewed the directions at > https://help.github.com/articles/support-for-subversion-clients/ , and > it's a fairly ugly hack, and work to do the integrated checkouts. The > last person I met who used it switched, with my help, to using git, > and using git-svn for access to their local Subversion repositories so > that they could commit working changes locally before submitting them > to the upstream Subversion repository. I recognize that this is *not* > the standard Subversion workflow, but I understood his desire to > publish upstream only the changes he wished to submit. > > I'm afraid that the Subversion gateways to github.com are a niche > market, and not one likely to get eager support from github.com > without a compelling business reason to support them. The learning > curve to use git effectively is pretty steep, but the market for > Subversion-only users has been shrinking profoundly over the last > decade.
So, what you're saying is that we have to revive and finish the ra_git branch. :) -- Brane
