Thorsten Schöning <[email protected]> writes:
> Tell us about the size of your repo
> it's format version and primary data types versioned
(Sorry for not giving this info earlier, and shifting the goal posts --
I personally went rcs->arch->darcs->git and never really used svn, so
I'm feeling pretty noob attacking this problem.)
du reports it is 18GiB. The current revno is 16115.
$ grep . /home/svn/PI/{format,db/fs-type,db/format}
/home/svn/PI/format:5
/home/svn/PI/db/fs-type:fsfs
/home/svn/PI/db/format:4
/home/svn/PI/db/format:layout sharded 1000
As to what kind of files are in there -- I'm not actually sure.
Just doing a dumb look at HEAD's list of files,
$ svn ls -R file:///home/svn/PI | wc -l
269281
And looking at the most common extensions:
$ svn ls -R file:///home/svn/PI | sed -n 's/.*\.//p' |
sort | uniq -c | sort -nr | head -20
36581 h 2438 txt
21732 patch 2375 sh
17621 html 2362 i
15023 c 2121 bmp
8143 py 1957 mk
3919 cpp 1932 po
3559 png 1916 class
3074 gif 1813 lua
2950 xml 1742 cs
2585 properties 1613 hpp
Obviously that's not weighted by size, and completely ignores anything
that's not in HEAD anymore.
* * *
It's currently hosted on an Ubuntu 10.04 server, so my server svn is
quite old:
subversion 1.6.6dfsg-2ubuntu1.3
apache2 2.2.14-5ubuntu8.12
I believe some of the users have svn 1.7 on their desktops, but not all.
I'm partway through provisioning the replacement Debian 7 server, which
will have
subversion 1.6.17dfsg-4+deb7u3
apache2 2.2.22-13
...hm, still 1.6. Is it worth me backporting a newer svn?
