On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 8:13 PM, Trent W. Buck <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'm stuck. Since it's no fun to have tens of thousands of empty revs
> in each project repo, my current approach is to leave existing
> projects in the monolithic repo, and new projects get separate repos.
>
Why do you think an empty rev will bother anyone any more in a
per-project rev that having the rev number jump from a commit to an
unrelated project does in the combined repo? It shouldn't be a
problem in either case. Rev numbers for any particular use don't need
to be sequential, you just need to know what they are.
--
Les Mikesell
[email protected]
