> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] > Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 9:30 PM >
> Can you please file an issue for this? OK. I've just created the issue: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4392 Thank you! > (It's probably "bar@" that's the correct desination name in this case.) Em... is it? I thought, " svn cares only about the last at sign in the argument, and it is not considered illegal to omit a literal peg revision specifier after that at sign. " ( http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.advanced.pegrevs.html ) means that only "@" in "svn copy foo bar@" is considered as an "at-sign for revision".
