I agree that it's a bug that, given a file 'foo', when 'bar' does not exist[1], svn copy foo bar@ and svn move foo bar@ don't create a destination file with the same name. (It's probably "bar@" that's the correct desination name in this case.) Can you please file an issue for this?
Thanks Daniel Варфоломеев Игорь wrote on Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:32:42 +0400: > Hi all, > > > > I think, I ran into a bug: > > > > although svn book declares “add one more @-sign” principle > > (http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn.advanced.pegrevs.html ), > > it looks like it’s working incorrectly in case of “svn move”. > > > > %svn% move wc\@2.txt@ wc\A\@2.txt@ > > > > - this would result in “wc\A\@2.txt@” file, instead of “wc\A\@2.txt”. > > > > > > It’s noteworthy, that “svn copy” works as it should. > > > > Please, find the full reproduction script here: > https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=8FD4EC3161ABA67A!939 . > > > > tested on svn, version 1.8.0 (r1490375); > > compiled Jun 17 2013, 19:47:41 on x86-microsoft-windows. > > (Part of Tortoise SVN 1.8.0 x64 <at> Win7 x64). > > > > > > PS > > I’m not subscribed and would appreciate being explicitly Cc:ed in any > responses. > > > > > > Best regards, > > Igor Varfolomeev > > >
