On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:08 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcor...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Mark Phippard <markp...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 7:18 AM, David Aldrich >>> <david.aldr...@emea.nec.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> > I think there was mention on the developers list of releasing >>>>> > Subversion 1.6.17. I am interested in the improvements to Windows >>>>> > checkout. >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> Are you talking about version 1.6.17 or version 1.7.x? I haven't seen >>>>> anything >>>>> about 1.6.17 here on the list, but there have been a few references on >>>>> 1.7.x >>>>> here... >>>>> >>>>> The news in the upcoming 1.7.x you'll find here: >>>>> http://subversion.apache.org/docs/release-notes/1.7.html >>>>> ... but no release date though >>>> >>>> I really did mean 1.6.17, as it is on the status page. >>> >>> Note that the change you are looking for has been nominated for >>> backport but does not have the essential 3 votes yet. So if you have >>> built the branch and seen improvements it would not hurt to start >>> lobbying. You might motivate someone to review the branch and vote >>> for it. >>> >>> See: /branches/1.6.x-issue3719 >> >> It currently has 2 of the 3 required votes (see >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS). I >> have previously looked at the branch (and built it), but didn't have >> time to review it in detail yet. I'll try to take another look tonight >> so this can be backported ... > > Ok, the 3rd vote is in, so the fix is all set for being backported. > When 1.6.17 gets made, it should hop along ...
The bugfix has been merged to the 1.6.x branch, so that's the one to be testing now: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.6.x/ -Hyrum