> 1.6.x is very stable now, with some interesting additional fixes > proposed > for 1.6.17: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.6.x/STATUS > It's unlikely that 1.7.0 will initialy be as stable as 1.6.x. > So I would recommend staying with 1.6.x for up to 6 months even after > 1.7.0 > is released. Unless you really need one of the new 1.7.x features right > away.
To be frank, we have been unable to find a compelling reason to upgrade our server from 1.5, though on the client end we use 1.6 versions. The unfortunate thing is that the various improvements made since early 1.5 have almost never said (in the release notes) whether they were on the client or on the server, and we cannot justify the cost/risk of an upgrade without knowing more specifics. My general sense is that there would be some improvements with merging behavior, and memory leak fixes, but I don't know what all they would be and we usually restart our server often enough to avoid serious leak issues. Knowing that we'll get SOME number of bug fixes, and the new HTTP library, will make the server upgrade to 1.7 worthwhile, though of course there will be an obvious question of the server stability with 1.7.0. On the client end, I expect we'll encourage people to upgrade within 1-3 months of 1.7, whether that means 1.7.0 or later. --Todd Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. The contents of this e-mail message (including any attachments) are confidential to and are intended to be conveyed for the use of the recipient to whom it is addressed only. If you receive this transmission in error, please notify the sender of this immediately and delete the message from your system. Any distribution, reproduction or use of this message by someone other than recipient is not authorized and may be unlawful.
