On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 11:49 AM Gedare Bloom <ged...@rtems.org> wrote: > > Hi Mathew, > > Not that I'm aware of, so probably not. There is ongoing work that is > improving the Zynq Ultrascale+ support, and there is also work ongoing > for the Xilinx Versal, which shares some features including R5F > co-processors. OAR has been pushing on Ultrascale, but I couldn't tell > you what their scope is, and I have been working with Chris Johns on > the Versal but the R5F is not yet in scope for me.
Gedare's right. OAR did the aarch64 bit port but we haven't touched the R5 yet. Everytime someone (you?) ask, I always think of the R52 FVP and tms570 BSPs but those aren't what you need. This is certainly something we'd like to see for RTEMS. It just needs a sponsor. <not so subtle hint> :) --joel > > Gedare > > On Sat, Aug 7, 2021 at 2:22 PM Mathew Benson <mben...@windhoverlabs.com> > wrote: > > > > Has anybody started or completed porting RTEMS to the R5? > > > > Sent from my iPad > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users@rtems.org > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
