On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 at 13:37, Schweikhardt, Jens (TSPCE3-TL4)
<jens.schweikha...@tesat.de> wrote:
>
> Hesham Almatary wrote:
>
> > You might be confusing taking BASE[XLEN-1:2] (see Figure 3.8) with shifting 
> > an address by 2. RTEMS aligns _RISCV_Exception_handler to 4 bytes as per 
> > the specification, so you'd always end up with an address with zeros in the 
> > least significant 2 bits. So, BASE[1:0] will always be zero. When you write 
> > that to mtvec, you'll effectively set the MODE to 0 (Direct), and 
> > BASE[XLEN-1:2] will be placed as is in mtvec.
>
> > I hope that clarifies things up a bit.
>
> Yes it does, thanks a lot. So in the end it was a notation misinterpretation.
> FIELD[x:y] means the slice of FIELD bits ranging from bit x to bit y, NOT 
> that FIELD is x-y bits wide.
>
Yes, exactly.

> Jens
>
> ________________________________
>
> Tesat-Spacecom GmbH & Co. KG
> Sitz: Backnang; Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRA 270977
> Persoenlich haftender Gesellschafter: Tesat-Spacecom Geschaeftsfuehrungs GmbH;
> Sitz: Backnang; Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart HRB 271658;
> Geschaeftsfuehrung: Dr. Marc Steckling, Kerstin Basche, Ralf Zimmermann
>
> [banner]



-- 
Hesham
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to