On 03/04/2019 15:41, Catalin Demergian wrote:
yes, I realized yesterday evening that gIntrErrs could be incremented
in the second if.
so I rewrote it like this
int gIntrptErrs;
int gInsertErrs;
RTEMS_INLINE_ROUTINE void _Scheduler_priority_Ready_queue_enqueue(
Chain_Node *node,
Scheduler_priority_Ready_queue *ready_queue,
Priority_bit_map_Control *bit_map
)
{
Chain_Control *ready_chain = ready_queue->ready_chain;
//_Assert(_ISR_Get_level() != 0);
if(_ISR_Get_level() == 0)
gIntrptErrs++;
cnt_before = _Chain_Node_count_unprotected(ready_chain);
_Chain_Append/*_unprotected*/( ready_chain, node );
cnt_after = _Chain_Node_count_unprotected(ready_chain);
if(cnt_after != cnt_before + 1)
gInsertErrs++;
_Priority_bit_map_Add( bit_map, &ready_queue->Priority_map );
}
It didn't seem that we enter that code with interrupts enabled ..
output was
# cpuuse
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU USAGE BY THREAD
------------+----------------------------------------+---------------+---------
ID | NAME | SECONDS |
PERCENT
------------+----------------------------------------+---------------+---------
*cdemergian build 11.15 gIntrptErrs=0 gInsertErrs=2*
0x09010001 | IDLE | 244.595117 |
99.238
0x0a010001 | UI1 | 1.000929 |
0.406
0x0a010002 | ntwk | 0.099342 |
0.040
0x0a010003 | SCtx | 0.068705 |
0.027
0x0a010004 | SCrx | 0.089272 |
0.036
0x0a010005 | eRPC | 0.000050 |
0.000
0x0a010006 | SHLL | 0.550608 |
0.223
0x0b010001 | | 0.000096 |
0.000
0x0b010002 | | 0.068307 |
0.027
------------+----------------------------------------+---------------+---------
TIME SINCE LAST CPU USAGE RESET IN SECONDS: 246.528065
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[/] #
Not all time time, most of the runs both globals were zero, which is
wierd ..
I also tried the patch. The issue was reproduced as well.
[/] # cpuuse
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU USAGE BY THREAD
------------+----------------------------------------+---------------+---------
ID | NAME | SECONDS |
PERCENT
------------+----------------------------------------+---------------+---------
*cdemergian build 16.25 gIntrptErrs=233694 gInsertErrs=1*
0x09010001 | IDLE | 94.488726 |
98.619
0x0a010001 | UI1 | 1.000931 |
1.044
0x0a010002 | ntwk | 0.030101 |
0.031
0x0a010003 | SCtx | 0.021441 |
0.022
0x0a010004 | SCrx | 0.027176 |
0.028
0x0a010005 | eRPC | 0.000049 |
0.000
0x0a010006 | SHLL | 0.215693 |
0.225
0x0b010001 | | 0.000096 |
0.000
0x0b010002 | | 0.027211 |
0.028
------------+----------------------------------------+---------------+---------
TIME SINCE LAST CPU USAGE RESET IN SECONDS: 95.867059
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
we are getting big numbers for gIntrptErrs (is that normal ? I don't
understand all the aspects of the patch just yet)
Can you set a break point to the gIntrptErrs++ and print the stack traces?
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de
PGP : Public key available on request.
Diese Nachricht ist keine geschäftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users