On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 2:51 AM Ian Caddy <i...@goanna.iinet.net.au> wrote:
> I guess to answer my own question after I have had a bit more of a look > into this, I assume it would be OK to change the build set? > > I am building for the arm platform so it uses the "rtems-default.bset" > > On my July 18 system this is: > > 5/rtems-autotools > devel/expat-2.1.0-1 > tools/rtems-binutils-2.30 > tools/rtems-gcc-7.3.0-newlib-3.0.0 > tools/rtems-gdb-8.0.1-1 > tools/rtems-tools-5-1 > tools/rtems-kernel-5 > > On my Dec 18 MSYS2 system it is: > > 5/rtems-autotools > devel/expat-2.1.0-1 > tools/rtems-gdb-8.0.1-1 > tools/rtems-binutils-2.31.1 > tools/rtems-gcc-7.4.0-newlib-2ab57ad59bc35dafffa69cd4da5e228971de069f > tools/rtems-tools-5-1 > tools/rtems-kernel-5 > > I assume it would be OK to change: > > tools/rtems-binutils-2.31.1 > tools/rtems-gcc-7.4.0-newlib-2ab57ad59bc35dafffa69cd4da5e228971de069f > > back to: > > tools/rtems-binutils-2.30 > tools/rtems-gcc-7.3.0-newlib-3.0.0 > > I am going to attempt this, but if there is a better way, I would more > than happy to try it. > If the files you are referencing haven't been removed, then this should work. But checking out the RSB from the appropriate date would be better. > > regards, > > Ian C. > > > On 11/01/2019 2:59 pm, Ian Caddy wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > We have progressed with our RTEMS5 project using the imx6ULL, and are > > getting closer to completing it, but we have been using linux tools > > since around July18 and now need to create msys2 tools for our customer. > > > > I have created the tools on msys2 around mid-december as they needed > > gdb earlier, and am only finally getting around to testing the rest of > > the tools, building our snapshot of RTEMS5 and libbsd. > > > > There have been some changes in the tools between July to December, > > and I had to do a small tweak to get our snapshot of RTEMS 5 working. > > > > Then I tried to build our July snapshot of libbsd, but this has proven > > to be a lot more difficult. I then tried the latest libbsd and am > > facing different but similar build issues. Things like <poll.h> need > > to be <sys/poll.h> and things like that. Even then this is the > > standard libbsd and not our custom version which will then need to be > > put together. > > > > So, I am wondering if it is possible to use the rtems-source-builder > > to build a particular version of the tools (for example from July 18) > > that we have been using on linux. > > > > I have the source-builder logs from that time if anyone is interested, > > or a nudge in the correct direction(I don't know much about > > source-builder as it normally works straight out of the box!!), to get > > this sorted? > > > > regards, > > > > Ian Caddy > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > users mailing list > > users@rtems.org > > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > users@rtems.org > http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ users mailing list users@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
