I guess to answer my own question after I have had a bit more of a look into this, I assume it would be OK to change the build set?

I am building for the arm platform so it uses the "rtems-default.bset"

On my July 18 system this is:

5/rtems-autotools
devel/expat-2.1.0-1
tools/rtems-binutils-2.30
tools/rtems-gcc-7.3.0-newlib-3.0.0
tools/rtems-gdb-8.0.1-1
tools/rtems-tools-5-1
tools/rtems-kernel-5

On my Dec 18 MSYS2 system it is:

5/rtems-autotools
devel/expat-2.1.0-1
tools/rtems-gdb-8.0.1-1
tools/rtems-binutils-2.31.1
tools/rtems-gcc-7.4.0-newlib-2ab57ad59bc35dafffa69cd4da5e228971de069f
tools/rtems-tools-5-1
tools/rtems-kernel-5

I assume it would be OK to change:

tools/rtems-binutils-2.31.1
tools/rtems-gcc-7.4.0-newlib-2ab57ad59bc35dafffa69cd4da5e228971de069f

back to:

tools/rtems-binutils-2.30
tools/rtems-gcc-7.3.0-newlib-3.0.0

I am going to attempt this, but if there is a better way, I would more than happy to try it.

regards,

Ian C.


On 11/01/2019 2:59 pm, Ian Caddy wrote:
Hi All,

We have progressed with our RTEMS5 project using the imx6ULL, and are getting closer to completing it, but we have been using linux tools since around July18 and now need to create msys2 tools for our customer.

I have created the tools on msys2 around mid-december as they needed gdb earlier, and am only finally getting around to testing the rest of the tools, building our snapshot of RTEMS5 and libbsd.

There have been some changes in the tools between July to December, and I had to do a small tweak to get our snapshot of RTEMS 5 working.

Then I tried to build our July snapshot of libbsd, but this has proven to be a lot more difficult.  I then tried the latest libbsd and am facing different but similar build issues.  Things like <poll.h> need to be <sys/poll.h> and things like that.  Even then this is the standard libbsd and not our custom version which will then need to be put together.

So, I am wondering if it is possible to use the rtems-source-builder to build a particular version of the tools (for example from July 18) that we have been using on linux.

I have the source-builder logs from that time if anyone is interested, or a nudge in the correct direction(I don't know much about source-builder as it normally works straight out of the box!!), to get this sorted?

regards,

Ian Caddy


_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to