Hi allThanks for the help so far guys. After yesterday's struggling, I wasn't really in the mood today to pick it up again so quickly. Will try again this WE.
Short question aside: I've got nothing against facelets (quite the contrary), but I understand from previous postings the combo Tomcat6 - MF120 - Tomahawk - JSP is a dead end. I think this is a problem as I guess most users will use this combo. Tomcat6 is kinda a standard and if you don't need Tomahawk, why not just use the RI... (MF could learn smth from their easy setup -- I think there's great value in defaulting much more so that the web.xml can remain much easier than MF makes it now) Facelets is better than JSP yet most users still use JSP... Certainly as I guess what most users will forst attempt(like myself) is migrate old apps to the new MF std. Or does JSP work if you just don't use JSTL? How good are your contacts with the Apache Tomcat team to perhaps address this issue in an incremental Tomcat release? (should this be the best way to solve this decoupling) Wolf On 7/20/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok I just got in a correction of Matthias, as it seems I cannot confirm > jetty yet. > Anyway, I will do furhter testing this afternoon to circle the entire > thing in a little bit (also I will try jetty personally) > > All I personally can say for now, is that I can confirm that the combination > of Tomcat 6 MyFaces 1.2 and Facelets work as they should. > > please watch https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1682 > for further comments on this. so, I noticed the TLD thing on ([1]) in tomcat 6.0.13 with and without tomahawk. Not in Jetty 6.1.2rc0 . -Matthias [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1682 -- Matthias Wessendorf further stuff: blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/ mail: matzew-at-apache-dot-org
