Do I remember right that you can build a tagged version?
On 6/13/06, Emmanuel Venisse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No, it isn't possible to build a particular revision and I don't see the interest to do it if the code in subversion isn't the latest. Emmanuel Lee Meador a écrit : > To make it work the way I hear you wanting, it looks like you need > something > that notices the changed Subverions revision number and knows the last > revision number that continuum built. Then it causes Continuum to build the > version after the last one built and repeats builds after that of each > subversion version number up to the current one. > > I'm not sure if you can tell Continuum to build a particular Subversion > version number. > > I'm not sure what would happen if a lot of little changes get made all at > once. There could be quite a backlog of builds to do. > > It would even build a version where the only change was to add a space in a > pom, for example, or other change that wouldn't effect the build outcome at > all. Of course, all you would lose is the time. > > -- Lee > > On 6/13/06, Carlos Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On 6/13/06, Baron Reznik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 18:28 +0200, Carlos Sanchez wrote: >> > > On 6/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> wrote: >> > > > I know I'd find this useful as well, for several reasons: >> > > > -If you simply let continuum build every 5 mins, there could >> potentially be more than 1 commit during that time, and you would be >> building multiple revisions worth of changes. Ideally, you would want to >> build once/revision so if the build breaks, you know which commit >> broke it. >> > > >> > > >> > > You are not considering here the time that it takes to build the >> project. >> > > a commits >> > > continuum starts building >> > > b commits >> > > continuum can't start building, busy >> > > c commits >> > > continuum can't start building, busy >> > > continuum finishes building >> > > continuum starts building b and c changes >> > > >> > > >> > >> > ^^^ That's exactly what I'm talking about. Sometimes it will build 1 >> > revision, and other times 2 or more revisions could be mixed into one >> > build. I'd like to avoid that. >> > >> >> You can't avoid this with a post commit hook >> >> > > >> > > > -The continuum server would not be making as many hits to the svn >> server. If you're building dozens and dozens of projects, this adds up >> when >> it's once every 5 mins. >> > > >> > > I don't realy know what is the overhead of getting the revision >> number >> > > to check for changes but shouldn't be heavy at all >> > > >> > >> > I don't know how you verify this, but I got the impression that >> > continuum was performing a 'svn update' (for subversion, anyways), >> > which, could be rather heavy depending on how your repository is laid >> > out. I'm not sure offhand if subversion provides a more efficient way >> > though. >> > >> >> svn info gives you the local revision >> svn info URL gives you the remote one >> >> conitnuum may be improved to use this instead of a checkout if it does >> not currently >> >> > > > >> > > > If you got rather fancy, it would sure be nice to have the commit >> check if there were new projects added, and automagically add them to >> continuum as well. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Carlos Sanchez >> > > > Sent: Thu 6/8/2006 1:54 PM >> > > > To: [email protected] >> > > > Subject: Re: Subversion post-commit hook >> > > > >> > > > why do you need that, setting a short period like 5 min is not >> enough? >> > > > >> > > > On 6/8/06, Chris Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > > > We'd like to trigger Continuum builds upon developer commits in >> > > > > Subversion. It sounds like to do so we need to develop an >> xml-rpc >> > > > > client. >> > > > > >> > > > > Has anyone developed a post-commit hook into Continuum from >> Subversion? >> > > > > Is there related documentation available? >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks. >> > > > > >> > > > > -Chris >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> _______________________________________________________________________ >> > > > > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may >> contain >> > > > > information of BEA Systems, Inc., its >> subsidiaries and affiliated >> > > > > entities, that may be >> confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or >> > > > > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the >> individual >> > > > > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended >> recipient, >> > > > > and have received this message in error, please immediately >> return >> this >> > > > > by email and then delete it. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard. >> > > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards. >> > > > -- The Princess Bride >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> >> >> -- >> I could give you my word as a Spaniard. >> No good. I've known too many Spaniards. >> -- The Princess Bride >> > > >
-- -- Lee Meador Sent from gmail. My real email address is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
