On 6/13/06, Baron Reznik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 18:28 +0200, Carlos Sanchez wrote:
> > On 6/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > I know I'd find this useful as well, for several reasons:
> > > -If you simply let continuum build every 5 mins, there could
potentially be more than 1 commit during that time, and you would be
building multiple revisions worth of changes. Ideally, you would want to
build once/revision so if the build breaks, you know which commit
broke it.
> >
> >
> > You are not considering here the time that it takes to build the
project.
> > a commits
> > continuum starts building
> > b commits
> > continuum can't start building, busy
> > c commits
> > continuum can't start building, busy
> > continuum finishes building
> > continuum starts building b and c changes
> >
> >
>
> ^^^ That's exactly what I'm talking about. Sometimes it will build 1
> revision, and other times 2 or more revisions could be mixed into one
> build. I'd like to avoid that.
>
You can't avoid this with a post commit hook
> >
> > > -The continuum server would not be making as many hits to the svn
server. If you're building dozens and dozens of projects, this adds up
when
it's once every 5 mins.
> >
> > I don't realy know what is the overhead of getting the revision
number
> > to check for changes but shouldn't be heavy at all
> >
>
> I don't know how you verify this, but I got the impression that
> continuum was performing a 'svn update' (for subversion, anyways),
> which, could be rather heavy depending on how your repository is laid
> out. I'm not sure offhand if subversion provides a more efficient way
> though.
>
svn info gives you the local revision
svn info URL gives you the remote one
conitnuum may be improved to use this instead of a checkout if it does
not currently
> > >
> > > If you got rather fancy, it would sure be nice to have the commit
check if there were new projects added, and automagically add them to
continuum as well.
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Carlos Sanchez
> > > Sent: Thu 6/8/2006 1:54 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: Re: Subversion post-commit hook
> > >
> > > why do you need that, setting a short period like 5 min is not
enough?
> > >
> > > On 6/8/06, Chris Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > We'd like to trigger Continuum builds upon developer commits in
> > > > Subversion. It sounds like to do so we need to develop an
xml-rpc
> > > > client.
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone developed a post-commit hook into Continuum from
Subversion?
> > > > Is there related documentation available?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > -Chris
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
_______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may
contain
> > > > information of BEA Systems, Inc., its
subsidiaries and affiliated
> > > > entities, that may be
confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
> > > > legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the
individual
> > > > or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended
recipient,
> > > > and have received this message in error, please immediately
return
this
> > > > by email and then delete it.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > -- The Princess Bride
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
