On September 17, 2015 11:52:55 PM GMT+02:00, Rich Felker <[email protected]> wrote: >On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:27:40PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer >wrote: >> On September 17, 2015 6:16:48 PM GMT+02:00, Yuriy Kolerov ><[email protected]> wrote: >> >Hi Rich. >> > >> >fallocate must return 0 or -1. However posix_fallocate my return an >> >error code. So I think it would be better to allow posix_fallocate >> >change errno as fallocate does it and fix posix_fallocate return >value >> >according to POSIX. >> >> fallocate () should be implemented on top of posix_fallocate, yes. > >I don't think this is possible. fallocate has an extra mode argument >which posix_fallocate lacks.
Right, didn't remember the mode arg. Thanks, _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
