On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:27:40PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On September 17, 2015 6:16:48 PM GMT+02:00, Yuriy Kolerov > <[email protected]> wrote: > >Hi Rich. > > > >fallocate must return 0 or -1. However posix_fallocate my return an > >error code. So I think it would be better to allow posix_fallocate > >change errno as fallocate does it and fix posix_fallocate return value > >according to POSIX. > > fallocate () should be implemented on top of posix_fallocate, yes.
I don't think this is possible. fallocate has an extra mode argument which posix_fallocate lacks. Rich _______________________________________________ uClibc mailing list [email protected] http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
