On Tuesday 09 April 2013 19:12:37 Oliver Grawert wrote: > hi, > On Di, 2013-04-09 at 19:57 +0300, Zoltán Balogh wrote: > ... > > > Actually it is not that difficult and we have good tools. The pkgme, > > pbuilder and the dozen of wrapper apps make packaging simple. > > > > But regardless how good wrappers and how well automated toolchain we > > invent to make it even more simple the developer still need to have the > > information for the control file and at least have some idea what > > license is the best for the application. > > is there any reason to build the package (instead of uploading it to a > PPA) ?
You are building a non-free app with ultra-secret-code and don't trust anyone so you do want to upload the source code to canonical servers. Cheers, Albert > all my above comments in this thread were solely referring to create a > source package once you are done with programming and have a ready to > run app (that you tested in qmlscene or by using a device (or even by > using a yet to come emulator) in an unpackaged manner ... > > there should be no need at all to build a binary package locally ... our > sdk should just make sure a source package is created and probably have > a "publish to PPA" button where the binary package then gets built ... > > *if* someone wants to do a local build i would consider that an advanced > task for which you can indeed use a pbuilder or some such ... generally > creating a *source* package should be completely arch agnostic though > and easy to automate from the sdk ... > > ciao > oli
-- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
