On 06/02/2008, biffster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 04 February 2008 02:13:19 pm Ben Collins wrote: > > > Elias, you are over simplifying this issue. If we disable autosuspend, > > then suspend/resume wont work for a good portion of people. After long > > I don't know about others, but I would much rather have USB 2.0 working > than > suspend/resume. While suspend/resume is kinda cool, USB 2.0 is a > necessity. > There's a reason I buy USB 2.0 devices: USB 1.1 is simply far too slow. I > need USB 2.0 to work. If that breaks suspend/resume, so be it. > > USB is a standard part of most user's computing experience. Suspend/resume > is > something that only a small number of users will use. I think it would be > much more logical to put Suspend/Resume as an OPTION, not as a the default > configuration.
I don't agree at all. USB 2 is just an faster version of USB 1.1. Suspend and resume either works or doesn't work. I can tolerate less USB bandwidth if it's necessary to have suspend and resume working. You still have _working_ USB, and I still have my suspend capability, which I use all the time (because it means I can leave my machine for 30 minutes or hours or weeks, without having to shut everything down and start up again next time). Oisín -- ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
