Rejected, you didn't document the license for the code in ext/mdspan Small additional nitpicks: The standards version isn't the latest one, might want to check that out. Maybe remove boilerplate comments in d/rules? I'd love a comment above all the lintian overrides explaining *why* it's not a big deal. I'm curious about the "no manpage by design" thing, does upstream explicitly say "we do not want our binaries documented in a standard way"?!
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2092065 Title: [needs-packaging] kms++ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2092065/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
