(In reply to alexander.kern from comment #125) > (Yeah, but not using the URL bar is just not as nice. For example look & > feel, use search & bookmarks keywords, afaik.)
Yep... perhaps there's room for webextensions to have a larger scope for interaction with the URL bar - you could file a bug in the webextensions product. > Ah thanks, I missed the mention of that pref! Well I'd rather have it not be > consistent, but I understand your reasoning and gave my opinion. Likewise! It's a tricky problem - I was joking on IRC the other day that really we need like 10 modifier keys instead of just 3, then it wouldn't be so hard to come up with a way to make things not conflict... > Still, should the combinations not stack like ctrl+shift canonize and open > in new window? alt+ctrl does already stack as expected (canonize and open > new tab). Why does only that stack? And alt+shift to open in new background > tab would be incredibly useful for users who don't want to mess with > about:config or don't know about it. They can just find it by trying it out > or understanding how stacking should work. > > Anyway this is a followup issue and you said you wanted this bug to be > closed, so if I don't hear back soon I'll submit a new ticket. Thanks! Yes, please submit a new bug for alt-shift / ctrl-shift. :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66566 Title: Inconsistent shortcuts for new tab To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/66566/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
