Emmet Hikory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>From a quick look at pyxine, the correct dependencies of python-pyxine > are not clear, given that one could write either an X or console > binding. The only reverse dependency of python-pyxine is lsongs. I see > two options, and encourage someone more familar with python or xine to > select one (or suggest something preferable) > > A) Add libxine1-x | libxine1-console | libxine1 (<< 1.1.8-2) to pyxine-xine > dependencies > B) Add libxine1-x to lsongs dependencies & nothing to pyxine-xine
My current guess is that we should go with option B. I've CC'ed the debian pyxine maintainer in this email. Jaldhar, what are your plans regarding the pyxine package in Debian? -- Gruesse/greetings, Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4 -- Re: Heads-up: small xine-lib transition in hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for amarok in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
