On Sun, 4 Nov 2007, Reinhard Tartler wrote: > Emmet Hikory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> From a quick look at pyxine, the correct dependencies of python-pyxine >> are not clear, given that one could write either an X or console >> binding. The only reverse dependency of python-pyxine is lsongs. I see >> two options, and encourage someone more familar with python or xine to >> select one (or suggest something preferable) >> >> A) Add libxine1-x | libxine1-console | libxine1 (<< 1.1.8-2) to pyxine-xine >> dependencies >> B) Add libxine1-x to lsongs dependencies & nothing to pyxine-xine > > My current guess is that we should go with option B. I've CC'ed the > debian pyxine maintainer in this email. > > Jaldhar, what are your plans regarding the pyxine package in Debian? >
Actually, I am slowly in the process of orphaning lsongs and all its dependencies. I am willing to fix all outstanding bugs first though. -- Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> La Salle Debain - http://www.braincells.com/debian/ -- Re: Heads-up: small xine-lib transition in hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Team, which is a bug contact for amarok in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
