The point seems to be, lyx installs by default templates for classes
that are not available, is this correct? If so, shouldn't the bug be
solved by providing separate packages for groups of templates, depending
on the appropriate texlive packages (maybe only texlive-publishers)?

-- 
lyx: missing TeX class "aa"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3080
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to