Yeah, That's correct. It seems a possible solution.
On 9/27/07, Vincenzo Ciancia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The point seems to be, lyx installs by default templates for classes > that are not available, is this correct? If so, shouldn't the bug be > solved by providing separate packages for groups of templates, depending > on the appropriate texlive packages (maybe only texlive-publishers)? > > -- > lyx: missing TeX class "aa" > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3080 > You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber > of the bug. > -- "In a world without fences who needs Gates" -- lyx: missing TeX class "aa" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3080 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
