Exactly. I strongly believe the bundle made by libreoffice-dictionaries is quite a good one, and I'm not the only one thinking that. Now, if there are two dictionaries for the same language we'll probably going to just pick the one in LO-dicts, since that's way easier to handle from a downstream point of view, if you disagree I'd just forward you to the libreoffice bug tracker. If there is a missing one and you can provide/link it I'd just ask to the LO people to get it in the bundle.
If a dictionary in the bundle gets outdated just ask them to update it. I've already sent them some requests, and they are always responsive and helpful. >From my point of view, feel free to use me as a proxy for those requests, >using this (once I get this package synced) or Debian's bug trackers. Do I miss something you're trying to point out? I'm all ears about suggestions on handling this thing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268953 Title: [needs-packaging] provide all dictionaries available for hunspell To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/language-selector/+bug/268953/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
