søn, 01 07 2007 kl. 20:54 +0000, skrev Frank Küster: > One morething which is strange is that the original reporter said that > there were *two* fork bombs after each other, and that the first was > "related" to mktexlsr, but still there were *etex* processes running. > > This I cannot explain anyhow, I assume that the bug reporter mixed > something up, please ask him to clarify that (I'm in a hurry, leaving > for holiday, and have no time to look up the launchpad bug and > reporter's e-mail address, sorry). To clarify (according to memory): Output: Running mktexlsr. This may take some time... Spawning of about 900 etex processes (which seem to stay) Output: done. Building format(s) --all . This may take some time... Spawning of _many_ more processes
I did not have texlive installed in feisty, only tetex (and xmltex and jadetex). > > I'm not sure what texlive and tex-common versions feisty had, but > > if I assume it resembles sarge (tex-common 1.0*), *then* I do not > have > > an explanation. > > We should really try to get exact version numbers (aptitude log?) I cannot find any information in /var/log/aptitude* about version numbers. -- Mads Chr. Olesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> shiyee.dk -- package texlive-base-bin 2007-11 failed to install/upgrade: post-installation script spawns thousands of processes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122863 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
