Mark, Unfortunately I am busy hacking away at the kubuntu-docs and can't take the lead on this. I was thinking more along the fact that within ubuntu-docs configuring Unity, etc would be covered by the documentation, book, etc. Why would this require acceptance of the contribution agreement? Would every editor/contributer to ubuntu-docs then have to be covered by the contribution agreement?
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:36 AM, Mark Shuttleworth < 600...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > > Jonathan, if you're willing to take the lead on the documentation, then > I would encourage you to put it in whichever location you think is best. > We would use the same licence as the Ubuntu wiki. If the docs are now or > in future likely to land in trunk then we ask them to be covered by the > contribution agreement. > > Cheers, > Mark > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu > Documentation Committers, which is subscribed to ubuntu-docs in ubuntu. > https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600875 > > Title: > No documentation for using/configuring Unity > > Status in Ayatana Design: > New > Status in Unity: > Triaged > Status in “ubuntu-docs” package in Ubuntu: > New > > Bug description: > Has the Unity team discussed how they are or will be working with the > Ubuntu Docs team to get things documented and in 10.10? > > I would be willing to help lead that discussion if that hasnt happened. > > > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600875 Title: No documentation for using/configuring Unity -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
