Thanks for the pointer, Matthew. * On Mallard, I think that's a decision for the folks who do the work! I see tool evolution / replacement as inevitable over time. I would hope we could always be trying to get closer to the goal of better cross-desktop commonality in that, but even within GNOME there will be iterations and evolutions.
* The divergence in shell is what it is. Even though Shell has evolved to look similar to Unity, there will always be areas of divergence. We can / should / will document Unity itself, but I recognise there will be linkages between that and the clean documentation of individual apps. * Encouraging collaboration between ubuntu-docs and the Ubuntu Manual Project seems healthy to me. To a certain extent, it's incumbent on us to document the whole, integrated platform, from boot manager to upstart to Unity. We've never been vanilla anything! That's more obvious now, but has always been the case. We have a similar challenge with developer API's, which we'll start to address this coming year. We need to present the complete platform, the sum of all our choices, in a coherent fashion. Mark -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600875 Title: No documentation for using/configuring Unity -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
