> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 02:57:41PM +0000, Holger Brunck wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 03:22:17PM +0200, Holger Brunck wrote: > > > > > > > This area was used for special purposes on kirkwood. On the > > > > current designs we don't need this anymore. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <[email protected]> > > > > --- > > > > board/keymile/Kconfig | 3 +-- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/board/keymile/Kconfig b/board/keymile/Kconfig index > > > > 41458813858..3a66b2915ac 100644 > > > > --- a/board/keymile/Kconfig > > > > +++ b/board/keymile/Kconfig > > > > @@ -31,8 +31,7 @@ config KM_PHRAM > > > > > > > > config KM_RESERVED_PRAM > > > > hex "Reserved RAM" > > > > - default 0x0 if MPC83xx > > > > - default 0x1000 if MPC85xx || ARCH_LS1021A > > > > + default 0x0 > > > > depends on !ARCH_SOCFPGA > > > > help > > > > Reserved physical RAM area at the end of memory for special > > > purposes. > > > > > > Can the whole thing be removed then? Thanks. > > > > > > > Good point, I can drop it completely. Should I send a v2 for the whole > > series then or only for this one? > > Assuming there's no conflicts, v2 of just this patch is fine. >
Ok done. Unfortunately, the patch shows up as a new patch. I used the message id from patchwork to keep the relation with: --in-reply-to=20250714132221.2471558-2-holger.bru...@hitachienergy.com Isn't that the right way to do it? Best regards Holger
