Hi Roelof, On 6 September 2010 18:32, Roelof Wobben <rwob...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>> index_of(5, (1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 10, 5, 5), 4) > 6 > > But in that tuple 5 is on position 3. > > Is the exercise here wrong ? > > Not neccesarily... I notice that the call is similar to the previous test case, but has an extra parameter "4", and that but that tuple that's being searched contains other 5's. If the extra parameter is interpreted as a "starting index", then the next index of "5" starting at position 4, would indeed be 6. If my guesstimated intention of the test paramters is correct then there's nothing wrong with the excercise/test and your implementation of index_of needs to be enhanced to properly handle this extra parameter/new test case. Walter
_______________________________________________ Tutor maillist - Tutor@python.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/tutor