-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Hi Jeremy
Why do you want this and why do you think this is a good idea? What are you trying to solve? The socks5 which Tor open is not a simple socks5 protocol implementation, it has some customizations and enhancements used by Tor Browser to isolate streams, etc. As TvdW suggests, you if you use a TCP proxy that will just redirect the requests, there should be no penalty of performance or features for the Tor socks5. But I am not sure why you want to do this. On 5/24/2015 2:30 PM, Jeremy Rand wrote: > On 05/24/2015 06:21 AM, Tom van der Woerdt wrote: >> Hi Jeremy, > >> After reading your message I wonder whether a simple TCP proxy >> is what you want. Maybe have a look at haproxy? > >> Tom > > Hi Tom, > > The intention is to have end user applications like Firefox connect > to the proxy rather than Tor's SOCKS proxy; as such, I would like > it to look pretty similar to Tor's SOCKS proxy from the end user > point of view. Based on this, it seems to me that an > implementation of the SOCKS protocol is necessary rather than a > simple TCP proxy (unless I'm confused). > > Cheers, -Jeremy > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVYbk+AAoJEIN/pSyBJlsRHj8H/3S1vhjWmmXu/5j7t4T4Go6s gC9XWbV7y651m2r/vTmLcXVmzCjeaelDZjIZaBmJykRTFeXCnoQKYAB38gUxBmn7 FXpy4jcy+IfWIgg0sOjcEx4HLek9/0H7GiFVg16koI9920HhEZPVUPzMsh4VqzSN 2WZNofDj/ljQj8qKMZmy3yT/V1HHJL2H1Oj0AEEko0hfXk25xjAjqrqFxNHXoNtl Ch4aIl5Zxoc/BQS4nqKKltTjCvqZTUpZigWs6BpgWkOjuE4naC5y5xwanHKVBseZ +HMpjkgPnDwCgE5OXYyGHLWLi2ndzBebGXcNpCcoS3DeAZjN3Jb0qcbnE4UhtE4= =3XTS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
