On 05/01/2015 09:14, grarpamp wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:28 AM, Peter Presland <pe...@wikispooks.org> wrote: >> services. The case cited is one where both parties require anonymity, >> the most widely known examples being the 'illegal markets', but there >> are at least two other cases: > > If you've ever used a chan, published things like torchat addresses, > joined HS irc, or held various accounts in onionland, you'd > find random anons engaging you and striking up uninhibited > conversations covering all sorts of subjects. These would > otherwise not occur if both parties were not anonymous. > Maybe I was not clear. I'm not arguing against dual-anonymity (ie HS provider and client). I agree it is good to have available. But that does not and should not exclude the other two cases I described.
IMO case 2 represents a large untapped potential user pool for Tor. -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
