I think the claim is that by default people want to be anonymous, but also be able to (voluntarily) prove their identity. If someone wants to do that, who am I to judge their anonymity goals? We can argue that this is too impractical to accomplish, but if it's not a huge amount of effort, the more diverse the users on Tor the better.
-V On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:14 AM, grarpamp <grarp...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:28 AM, Peter Presland <pe...@wikispooks.org> wrote: >> services. The case cited is one where both parties require anonymity, >> the most widely known examples being the 'illegal markets', but there >> are at least two other cases: > > If you've ever used a chan, published things like torchat addresses, > joined HS irc, or held various accounts in onionland, you'd > find random anons engaging you and striking up uninhibited > conversations covering all sorts of subjects. These would > otherwise not occur if both parties were not anonymous. > -- > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk -- tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org To unsubscribe or change other settings go to https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
